Original articles on science, the economy, sociology, the paranormal, and history. This section also includes conversations with people I find interesting.
TwitterCounter
Original articles on science, the economy, sociology, the paranormal, and history. This section also includes conversations with people I find interesting.
I was spinning on turntable.fm in a 3am ambient set. After an hour I noticed that none of the skins in the crowd were moving or commenting. That’s when I realized I was staring in to the dead eyes of vacant avatars. In the real world their flesh and blood counterparts were sleeping while their lifeless cartoon eyes were fixed on me. I’ve been online since I was ten years old, but until this point I never fully visualized the concept of virtual reality and how separate, yet connected, it is from the physical world. The bedroom is intimate. I can’t even get to sleep around good friends in a motel, yet here I was looming over the sleeping bodies of strangers as an animated glyph — in real time! The proximity was uncomfortable. For that brief instant I looked beyond the singularity. I leaped forward to a shameless, naked, garden of eden and recoiled in fear. I need to write about it.

Q and A session with Alex Fitch after the London premiere of The Arcadian. Thanks to everyone who was there in person, and thank you to Alex for an outstanding interview. Alex is the assistant editor for Electric Sheep and can be heard on Resonance 104.4FM (London). Don’t forget to listen here for Alex with other filmmakers on post-apocalyptic cinema.
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
The following is part of a private facebook thread I was engaged on with a churched supporter of the right. I’ve omitted his comments for the sake of privacy as his argument doesn’t directly impact the message provided in the following quote.
I’m sorry that your friend lacks the ability to look at thought experiments from other people’s perspectives. I’ll try one more analogy before considering it a wash… in this scenario I’m the member of a growing and vocal movement in this country to get atheists elected to office and further curtail religious expression by doing away with Christian holidays. When I speak at rallies I use language like “we’ll show those right-wing religious screw jobs that this movement isn’t going away and we’re going to TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK”. Now, your friend Daniel has just left church on Sunday and is walking down the street, he encounters my rally, hundreds strong pushing signs in his face that say “JESUS IS A MURDERER”, “THIS IS MY COUNTRY GET THE HELL OUT”, and “WE’RE ALL FAGS, SOME ARE JUST MORE OPEN ABOUT IT”. They see Daniel holding his copy of the bible and begin to yell at him that “His life is a waste because he’s living a fairy tale” and “If we beat you up would Jesus come down to stop us?”. Well, I’m sure Daniel wouldn’t be too comfortable. In fact I think he’d be downright shaken when he sees these same people getting elected to congress and showing up on the news regularly. Now the message of my “fringe” group is looking more and more mainstream. We’re in his community regularly passing out pamphlets and when he says “no thanks, I’m christian” we look him up and down and say “There are pills you can take that will cure you from your dementia if you want them. We can give them out for free if you stop by our community center”. Would Daniel be offended at that? Daniel might even think that we’re plotting to persecute him and do him harm. Well, that’s what I’m living right now and his lack of perspective just reinforced my view of most Christians who want their “core” values stuffed in my face. I’m not going to “listen ” to any of them until I’m promised, outright promised, that their values won’t effect my way of life or personal freedoms in any way. I think any reasonable person would want that and I think if the situation was reversed Christians would DEMAND that.
As a follow up to this, I received this message from assistant pastor Andy Pickens of Shady Grove Presbyterian Church (Derwood, MD). I need to make it clear that Mr. Pickens was not the person I was initially engaged with. That individual did not respond.
Dekker I appreciate your honesty and the expressiveness of your feelings. I am a ordained elder and registered evangelist in a global denomination. At first I was ready to dismiss you as a conspiracy theorist\buildaburgher types. However, Isee your plight. Granted we want people to believe like we do. However, you can’t force love. It must be a choice or else it wouldn’t be called love. You may hear us say Christianity isn’t a religion and that is correct. Its not a policy either. Its about who I choose to love. Our Father chose the entire human race whether they accepted him or not. The church must do the same. I’m sorry for how you have been mistreated by my people. I’ve taken some hits from them myself. Please know that there are some of us who are listening to you and want to see the Church made whole.
Sometimes it takes an atheist to show us what a Christian is.
I’m not a member of Anonymous in any true or official sense. I’ve never participated in a cyber attack and I’ve never done anything to aid or otherwise directly help Anonymous perform a cyber attack. I’ve never contributed to Anonymous financially (as if their was a way to do so) and I don’t intend to if any means to perform such funding became available to me.
I’m just an artist who has become familiar, through mainstream media outlets, with Anonymous. I understand it and I understand them. I’m sympathetic to a number of the causes they’ve elected to champion and find it interesting to follow their news and inform my followers about their actions. I have no direct connection, to my knowledge, to any core organizing member(s) of Anonymous. I don’t believe anyone exists in that capacity.
Why do I feel the need to write this? Because I appreciate the spirit of Anonymous and I’m not excited about becoming a public face for the Anonymous witch hunt that I fear will start brewing in the United States. I, as a citizen, have the right to my opinion, so long as that opinion does not bring undue harm to another.
Recently, NATO has proposed that member states discuss the possibility of conventional military action against Anonymous. As my friends in Brooklyn might say “shit just got real”. I’m making a stand on this website and all platforms available to me to say, as of this moment, I am supportive of the political message Anonymous is acting upon. Do I support their methods? I can’t endorse anything that causes harm, financial or otherwise, to a person or entity. This is as far as my connection to Anonymous goes. They’re not a well-structured group, as some in the government believe, and it’s difficult to reconcile their HBGary infiltration with instances of cyber-bullying they’ve been credited with. This is the nature of the beast, because there are no leaders. Anyone with an idea can be a leader in Anonymous.
Actions like the upcoming “Empire State Rebellion“, a call to rally peacefully against the federal reserve bank (which I endorse), are non-violent protests in the tradition of histories great movements and I’m proud to participate in spreading the word.
If my current, or future, endorsements lead to a curtail of my civil rights Anonymous will have been proven correct. Perhaps, under state-sponsored torture and persecution, I’ll come to understand that I’ve been an Agent of Goldstein this entire time. But who else is a thought criminal with me?
In his open letter from a few years ago entitled “The War on Religion” Ron Paul states:
Through perverse court decisions and years of cultural indoctrination, the elitist, secular Left has managed to convince many in our nation that religion must be driven from public view. The justification is always that someone, somewhere, might possibly be offended or feel uncomfortable living in the midst of a largely Christian society, so all must yield to the fragile sensibilities of the few. The ultimate goal of the anti-religious elites is to transform America into a completely secular nation, a nation that is legally and culturally biased against Christianity.
Mr. Paul, this is where Columbines are born and raised. I have felt, at many times during my school life, a sense of exclusion. Even though I grew up in an era when religion wasn’t “forced” in schools it still existed in ugly and discriminatory ways. Teachers would ask what church my parents attended. I once saw my music teacher ringing a bell at a local church asking my friends and I, on a Saturday, if we’d heard the good news and invited us to bible study. I respectfully told her “no thanks, my family doesn’t believe in god”. The next week in class my friend and I were singled out to clean the instruments. This duty rotated and we’d cleaned them just two weeks ago in a class of thirty, but we did it. The next week, us again. The following week, us again. Moments of “silence” were common. When I would take the time to draw pictures on my notepaper teachers would tell me it was disrespectful to draw while “some students prayed”. So, by that logic I was forced to hang my head and mimic prayer instead of meditating on my own thoughts in my own way.
Where this draws a parallel to the tragedy at Columbine is that you have a homogeneous majority applying pressure to a minority. I had support and love at home, but if I didn’t have parents who fought for my rights as an atheist (something they themselves never claimed to be) I might have felt the impulse to do violence to my perceived oppressors.
Saying that a “secular elite” wants Christians to not be able to worship in their community is all well and good, but it’s either a juvenile view or veiled malice. The real people, the flesh and blood people, who choose to enforce separation of church and state vary considerably across this country. Atheists are not without fear of prejudice and some evangelical educators may be inclined to “save” our children or punish us through them without the kinds of legal protections we’ve fought so hard for. Our beliefs (or lack thereof) cross lines of color, gender, and sexuality, so we’re sometimes the invisible minority. Often we try to blend in and not make waves, because in some parts of the country pronouncing your way of life is an invitation to harassment.
No sir, religion must be banned from schools in ALL FORMS. I appreciate Mr. Paul’s desire to encourage young people of his own faith to explore its traditions, but by placing their symbols on public property (that atheists pay for out of their hard-earned money) is offensive and dangerous. Young people are naturally drawn to want acceptance, and can be very cruel on those who are not like them. Will you Mr. Paul, take responsibility… personal responsibility… for that child who decides he wants to be accepted and throws a rock at a young woman who doesn’t clasp her hands in prayer in front of the nativity scene you’ve erected at her school? Will you fly to her town and cradle her crying head when a teacher chooses to skip her over on cupcake day because she was “insubordinate” by not closing her eyes during her fellow students’ prayer circle? Will you tell her it will be alright when mean girls tape torn bible pages to her backpack and call her names? Her parents, who pay taxes for this, might need to work two or three jobs. Her father’s manager at the local store just happens to be her over-zealous teacher’s husband. Is that man going to jeopardize his only income in a bad economy to stand up for his daughter? No. He’s going to tell her to be strong and he’s going to feel like a weak failure of a parent. Too poor to move to California or New York, he’s stuck in the community he was born in… a community that no longer fits his beliefs.
By allowing communities to “live the way they want” you’re forcing mass migrations and driving a deeper rift in this country’s already strained fabric. “If you don’t like it, move!” is not a way to teach tolerance.
Where does this leave the little girl from our example? She’s now sixteen. She found a boyfriend with a car who isn’t part of a church. They both feel like outcasts. The teasing hasn’t stopped. Her father’s manager’s wife is now promoted to principal and routinely gives the girl detentions for not participating. No one is going to challenge her, why should they? With all these “discipline problems” on her transcripts she’s paranoid that she’ll never be accepted to the college she dreamed of. To her it was a way out of the town she feels trapped in. The idea of college moved her forward and kept her sane. It was the only thing she lived for after years of abuse. Now she sees all her dreams fading away. Her boyfriend is angry that she feels this way and takes his father’s gun to school. One by one the bloody bodies fall to the ground. Each one of them is revenge for stealing his girlfriend’s future in the name of their “god”. The victims? The football star and his scholarship. The popular girl whose father is the pastor. The teacher who never did a bad thing to the girl, but kept a painting of Jesus behind her on the chalkboard (something the girl saw as taunting).
That blood is all on your hands Mr. Paul and it will never wipe off. If you don’t protect the “fragile sensibilities of the few” the majority will learn how dangerous a caged animal can be. All because you want to take your religious scenes out of the church and bring them to a place where developing children and diverse cultural backgrounds clash head-on. You’re tossing a match into the powder keg and watching it burn.
I’ll say it here and now! You, Mr. Paul, have the makings of a terrorist if you don’t rethink the consequences of your words.